Hi,

Work in the access layer revealed something I find a bit disturbing, at least with the way the code looks today. In the constructor of impl.store.access.btree.BTreeScanInfo:

        try
        {
            stat_treeHeight = scan.getHeight();
        }
        catch (Throwable t)
        {
            stat_treeHeight = -1;
        }

I didn't understand why Throwable was caught and ignored, so first I tried to change it to StandardException. This caused the test ddlTableLockMode to fail. I looked at what was going on, and found this to be thrown from the code above (code modified to print the Throwable):

*** Start: ddlTableLockMode jdk1.5.0_11 2007-03-15 13:53:12 ***
48a49,52
> org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED ControlRow.Get() is being called on a closed container. > org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED ControlRow.Get() is being called on a closed container. > org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED ControlRow.Get() is being called on a closed container. > org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED ControlRow.Get() is being called on a closed container.
Test Failed.
*** End:   ddlTableLockMode jdk1.5.0_11 2007-03-15 13:53:21 ***

As I said, I find this a bit disturbing. Can anyone with knowledge of this part of the code shed some light on this?

Specifically:
 a) Is this expected behavior?
 b) Can you add a descriptive comment for the catch block?
c) Should the catch block be more specific, and maybe check for the expected assert failure?



thanks,
--
Kristian

Reply via email to