[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12481197 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-2261: ------------------------------------------ I think examples in VALUES expression page shows that we can call it statement ..... -- 3 rows of 1 column VALUES (1),(2),(3) -- 3 rows of 1 column VALUES 1, 2, 3 -- 1 row of 3 columns VALUES (1, 2, 3) -- using a built-in function VALUES CURRENT_DATE -- getting the value of an arbitrary expression VALUES (3*29, 26.0E0/3) -- getting a value returned by a built-in function values char(1) Now I understood that there exists both of VALUES expression and VALUES statement. Then I think wording itself is not problem. // Sorry that my opinion is different from first one .... However, I think information for VALUES statement is placed too suddenly in context of VALUES expression page. Because VALUES statement is not so familiar with many reader, I think some of care is needed. > Questionable use of word "statement" in VALUES expression of Derby Reference > Manual should be changed to "clause" > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-2261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2261 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Documentation > Environment: > http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/rrefsqlj11277.html > Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama > Assigned To: Kim Haase > > "VALUES statement" in next one sentence in "VALUES expression" of Derby > Reference manual should be changed to "VALUES clause". > >You use a VALUES statement when you do not have a FROM clause. > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200701.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.