[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12482424
]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-2458:
-----------------------------------------
So I'm a little confused by the "Patch generally looks good but it's good to
have clear & logical naming."
Is this patch ready to commit? If so, I'll go ahead and do so,
Or do you want the naming changed first? Would it be sufficient for me to
change the JDBC.assertColumnTypes to JDBC.assertParameterTypes when it's
committed?
> Convert lang/unaryArithmeticDynamicParamter.java to junit
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2458
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Test
> Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
> Reporter: Manjula Kutty
> Assigned To: Manjula Kutty
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
> Attachments: DERBY-2458_diff_03_16.txt,
> DERBY-2458_diff_03_16_ver2.txt, DERBY-2458_diff_03_19.txt,
> DERBY-2458_diff_ver1.txt, DERBY-2458_stat_03_19.txt, DERBY-2458_stat_ver1.txt
>
>
> Place holder to convert lang/unaryArithmeticDynamicParameter.java to junit
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
