[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran all of the DDL statements for "bt1" as copied from that test,
then ran the statements you showed in your example. But it looks
like I'm seeing different behavior
Unless you have applied Dan's 827 patch you should :)
Oops, I get it now. Sorry for the noise.
If that might solve the problem you're seeing (which I am not
currently able to reproduce) then I think the approach would be to
generate the array of probe values as a "saved object", which can then
be retrieved from the activation just like any other saved object.
But you would need to change the code generation to create such saved
objects, right?
Yes, that is correct.
Sure. I'll post a repro script (which is basically just inbetween.sql
with a lot of stuff snipped) together with an updated DERBY-827 patch
which includes Dan's original changes and some smaller fixups which I
have added along the way, (the fixup patch currently there is a bit
outdated).
Thanks!
Army
