[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485365
 ] 

Laura Stewart commented on DERBY-1934:
--------------------------------------

Nope, forgot to change the title of rrefjta16677 in the ditamap.  Done now :-)

One concern that I have with this new wording for DataSource, well, actually 2 
concerns:

1 - It doesn't reflect what Derby implements.
2 - The term "factory" is not something that I am familiar with... is this 
standard Java terminology?  Will it translate correctly?

The following comment was from Lance (directly in derby-dev
in response to a question (shown with >>) from Kim

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 3/29/07, Lance J. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > So we are neutral on DriverManager vs. Datasource, and the Working
> > With Derby example is okay?
> Yes DriverManager is *not* going away and is a perfectly acceptable,
> especially now that u do not have to load the driver explicitly.
> 
> Ideally to use DataSources in a more portable way outside of an
> environment which supports JNDI, it would require a Factory so that you
> do not have to instantiate implementation classes.
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since I am not that familiar with Java... what I gleen from Lance's comment
is what we have in the Working with Derby now is okay (leave DriverManager as 
is)
... However,  I don't understand the last paragraph of his comment at all 
(it is not clear if we should change WWD and have users use a "Factory", 
whatever that is...)

> Reference Manual updates - J2EE Compliance: Java Transaction API and 
> javax.sql Extensions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1934
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: Laura Stewart
>         Assigned To: Laura Stewart
>         Attachments: derby1934_1.diff, derby1934_2.diff, derby1934_html2.zip, 
> rrefjta18596.html
>
>
> J2EE Compliance: Java Transaction API and javax.sql Extensions: 
>  
> Section = javax.sql:JDBC Extensions 
> File = http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/rrefjta18596.html 
> Update = 
> This URL no longer exists: (For more details about these extensions, see  
> http://java.sun.com/products/jdbc/jdbc20.stdext.javadoc/javax/sql/package-summary.html).
>  The page that has this information, although you have to browse to the 
> section called JDBC 2.0 Optional Package API is  
> http://java.sun.com/products/jdbc/download.html  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to