[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493016
]
Jørgen Løland commented on DERBY-1828:
--------------------------------------
Thank you for the comment, Dan. I see your point regarding 28502, and hence
leave it where it is. I will continue with this patch as described, but give
the community some days to respond to whether or not it can be included in this
release.
> Access rule violations should use a SQL state starting with '42' according to
> the SQL standard.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1828
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1828
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.3.0.0
> Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
> Assigned To: Jørgen Løland
> Attachments: DERBY-1828-1.diff, DERBY-1828-1.stat
>
>
> The SQL standard says that SQL State '42' is for "syntax error or access
> rule violation" (section 23.1).
> There is a question of what JDBC 4.0 exception should be thrown for a access
> rule violation,
> JDBC 4.0 maps '42' to SQLSyntaxErrorException which seems wrong for an access
> rule.
> Message thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200609.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
