[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493432
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-2603:
------------------------------------------
I think the word "binary" in this statement is mistaken of "boolean".
// Both types concern to concept of 0 and 1.
// Then I think person who is familiar with computer may misuse them.
As you wrote, we can recognize "binary" stands for number of argument here.
But I think it is not good usage of word here and could not believe it is
intense of the original writer.
At first, I misunderstood that the two values are compared as binary value !
Again, I can't believe that writer use the word "binary" for that meaning , the
number of arguments....
> Minor erratum in page of VARCHAR in Derby Reference manual
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2603
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2603
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Environment:
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/ref/rrefsqlj41207.html
> Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
> Priority: Minor
>
> I found next statement in the page through translation into Japanese.
> > When binary comparison operators are applied to VARCHARs, the lengths of
> > the operands are not altered, and spaces at the end of the values are
> > ignored.
> I think "binary" should be replaced as "boolean".
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
