[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497880
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-2379:
-------------------------------------------
Thanks for addressing my comments, Anurag! I will take a look at the latest
patch and commit it if the tests pass and I don't find more issues.
As to the discussion about LOBFile, even if we cannot let LOBFile implement the
StorageFile interface, I still feel it would be cleaner to split the code for
encrypted and non-encrypted LOBs. For instance, we could let LOBFile handle
unencrypted LOBs, and have another class EncryptedLOBFile which extended
LOBFile and handled the encrypted LOBs. But that could be addressed as a
separate clean-up task later.
> provide encryption support for temporary files used by lob if the data base
> is encrypted
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2379
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: JDBC
> Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
> Environment: all
> Reporter: Anurag Shekhar
> Assigned To: Anurag Shekhar
> Attachments: CosmeticComments_1.txt, derby-2379.diff,
> derby-2379v2-conflict.diff, derby-2379v2.diff, derby-2379v3.diff
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
