[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
A B updated DERBY-1816:
-----------------------
Attachment: d1816_recycleCleanup_v3.patch
Committed d1816_recycleCleanup_v3.patch with svn # 540740:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=540740
The difference between v2 and v3 is that the latter sets the time-related
fields to "0" when getting a timestamp value from a SQL date. This more
accurately matches the behavior as it was is in Derby prior to the changes for
this issue:
_v2:
< + cal.set(year, month, day);
< + return new java.sql.Timestamp(cal.getTimeInMillis());
---
_v3:
> + cal.set(year, month, day, 0, 0, 0);
> + java.sql.Timestamp ts = new
> java.sql.Timestamp(cal.getTimeInMillis());
> + ts.setNanos(0);
> + return ts;
Other than that the two patches are the same.
> Client's ResultSet.getTime() on a SQL TIMESTAMP column loses the sub-second
> resolution and always has a milli-second value of zero.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1816
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1816
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC, Network Client
> Affects Versions: 10.1.1.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6, 10.3.0.0
> Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
> Assigned To: A B
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: d1816_recycleCleanup_v1.patch,
> d1816_recycleCleanup_v2.patch, d1816_recycleCleanup_v2.stat,
> d1816_recycleCleanup_v3.patch
>
>
> In embedded the java.sql.Time object returned from ResultSet.getTime() for a
> SQL TIMESTAMP object has its millisecond value for the time portion equal to
> that for the java.sql.Timestamp value.
> In client the millisecond time value for such a value is always set to zero.
> Note a Derby SQL TIME value has by definition resolution of only a second so
> its millisecond value is always zero,
> but java.sql.Time is not a direct mapping to the SQL Type, it's a JDBC type,
> so when converting from a SQL TIMESTAMP
> it should retain the precision.
> The new test lang.TimeHandlingTest has this assert code that shows the
> problem, one of its calls will be commented out
> with a comment with this bug number.
> private void assertTimeEqual(Time tv, Timestamp tsv)
> {
> cal.clear();
> cal.setTime(tv);
>
> int hour = cal.get(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY);
> int min = cal.get(Calendar.MINUTE);
> int sec = cal.get(Calendar.SECOND);
> int ms = cal.get(Calendar.MILLISECOND);
>
> // Check the time portion is set to the same as tv
> cal.clear();
> cal.setTime(tsv);
> assertEquals(hour, cal.get(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY));
> assertEquals(min, cal.get(Calendar.MINUTE));
> assertEquals(sec, cal.get(Calendar.SECOND));
> assertEquals(ms, cal.get(Calendar.MILLISECOND)); <<<<<<<<<<<<<
> FAILS HERE
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.