[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499392
]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-2705:
------------------------------------------
Resembling problem exists in X0Y59 too.
Attempt to add or enable constraint(s) on table '<rowName>' failed because the
table contains <constraintName> row(s) that violate the following check
constraint(s): <tableName>.
The description should be
Attempt to add or enable constraint(s) on table '<tableName>' failed because
the table contains <rowName> row(s) that violate the following check
constraint(s): <constraintName>.
> Description of error message for X0X61 in SQL error messages and exceptions
> of Reference manual is not appropriate.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2705
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2705
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
>
> I found next description.
> The values for column '<location>' in index '<columnName>' and table
> '<indexName>.<schemaNamet>' do not match for row location <tableName>. The
> value in the index is '<value>', while the value in the base table is
> '<value>'. The full index key, including the row location, is '<indexKey>'.
> The suggested corrective action is to recreate the index.
> I think positions of several words are not right.
> I think next is right locations.
> The values for column '<columnName>' in index '<indexName>' and table
> '<schemaNamet>.<tableName>' do not match for row location <location>. The
> value in the index is '<value>', while the value in the base table is
> '<value>'. The full index key, including the row location, is '<indexKey>'.
> The suggested corrective action is to recreate the index.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
