[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mamta
Date: Thu May 31 14:30:02 2007
New Revision: 543266
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=543266
Log:
DERBY-2599
There are few character string types that should take their collation type from
compilation schema. I had earlier checked in code for them
to use current schema rather than compilation schema (For reference
http://www.nabble.com/more-on-system-schema-vs.-user-schema-and-character-constants.-p10885286.html)
With this commit, I am adding an utility method in ValueNode called
setCollationUsingCompilationSchema(int) which will use the compilation
schema's collation type for it's DTD. And it will use the passed int value to
set its DTD's collation derivation. This utility method will
be used by the subclasses of ValueNode to set their DTD's collation type to
compilation schema's type wherever required.
This is confusing ...
Note that all the
character string types always take their collation from the compilation schema.
For instance, persistent character string type column from a
table will take the collation type from the schema their table belongs to
rather than the compilation schema.
The "for instance" contradicts the "Note" it is trying to enforce?
Note says all character types take the collation from the compilation
schema.
For instance says that character string columns don't.
Can you clarify?
Dan.
