We should rather claim that 10.3 has "more security features" than
10.2 and that more of them are enabled by default.
I like this wording. If the word "safer" is going to be misleading, then
the 10.3 release notes should avoid it.
[...snip...]
I certainly think that any documentation or discussion should not imply
in any way that 10.3 out of the box is a secure system.
I agree.
Thanks to Dan for the analysis of the use-cases addressed (and not
addressed) by the 10.3 security work. Thanks to John, Bernt, and
Kristian for the additional feedback.
Regards,
-Rick
