[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-2451:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: Server4.trace
I was able to reproduce the behavior when connecting with two different SQL
Workbench/J instances. Attaching the server trace which shows that the second
SQL Workbench/J does in fact issue a shutdown when the application instance is
closed (step 8 of quartz' repro). This would be proper application behavior if
this were an embedded database. Apparently SQL Workbench/J does not distinguish
between the embedded and client/server modes.
This is therefore a duplicate of DERBY-256. There is definitely no data
coherence risk, since the database is being shutdown via the normal shutdown
mechanism. To prevent this possible denial of service, upgrade to 10.3, and
enable authentication and SQL authorization when starting up your network
server. See also DERBY-2264.
> a client can crash connections of another client
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2451
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2451
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.2.2.0
> Reporter: quartz
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Server4.trace
>
>
> Using 10.2.2.0.
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1-Start a NetworkServerControl
> 2-Start a 1st client (sqlworkbench/J), show some rows of some db, table X
> (stay connected)
> 3-Start a 2nd client (sqlworkbench/J), show some rows of some db, table X.
> 4-disconnect 2nd client
> 5-redo the 1st client query (refresh)
> You get a non architected message, sqlstate 58009, db errorcode -4499.
> In derby log, I see a shutdown of the database, and a restart.
> No matter how badly and corrupted a client connection can get, nor if the
> client connection is
> a bug in any client, such corruption should never destabilise a "server",
> certainly not other clients connections.
> It may be that the client tries to shutdown the DB; it shouldn't have such
> privilege anyway since it
> is a network "client" connection, NOT an embedded connection.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.