On 7/19/07, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just a gentle reminder, no-one can veto a release. Thus anyone's desires
for a specific bug to be fixed do not impose any requirement on a
release manager. It is ok for a release to proceed "ignoring" -1 votes
as long as it has the required number of +1 PMC votes.
Though, I think if a release does have -1 votes that it is wise for the
release manager to consider them before putting the release on the mirrors.
Dan.
Thx for that reminder Dan. My choice for another release candidate is
not the -1 vote per se (although it does point to a concern with
10.3.1.2), but rather the impact of not having the fix for DERBY-2896
in it; without the fix it becomes necessary to fix DERBY-1107 which
was indicated as a non-trivial change.
Myrna
