Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Stanley Bradbury wrote:
As I indicated with my [-1] vote to the 10.3.1.2 VOTE thread: I need
the fix for Derby-2896 to be part of official 10.3 release - this
requires that new release candidtate be created (presumably 10.3.1.3?)
Just a gentle reminder, no-one can veto a release. Thus anyone's
desires for a specific bug to be fixed do not impose any requirement
on a release manager. It is ok for a release to proceed "ignoring" -1
votes as long as it has the required number of +1 PMC votes.
Though, I think if a release does have -1 votes that it is wise for
the release manager to consider them before putting the release on the
mirrors.
Dan.
Of course. I mentioned my vote and stated the importance (to me) of
having this fix in the context of this thread asking "..another release
candidate?", nothing more implied.
