[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John H. Embretsen closed DERBY-2988.
------------------------------------


Thank you for committing, Bryan! The fix is in the trunk, so I'm closing the 
issue.

> Add max heap memory setting for JVMs spawned when running ant junitreport
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2988
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Build tools, Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: John H. Embretsen
>            Assignee: John H. Embretsen
>             Fix For: 10.4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d2988_v1.diff, d2988_v1.stat
>
>
> Rationale for adding an explicit max heap size setting for JVMs spawned by 
> ant when running 'ant junitreport':
> 1) To avoid running out of memory during runs of 'ant junitreport' on systems 
> where the default max heap size is too small for one or more test suites 
> executed by the junitreport target. For example, on client-class machines 
> using Sun's JVM (version 1.6 or older) the default max heap size is usually 
> 64 MB. The lang._Suite junit test suite currently requires roughly 170 MB.
> This will reduce some unnecessary noise in the developers' regression test 
> results.
> 2) To have the test suites run with consistent max heap size settings 
> regardless of machine class. By using default values, some machines/JVMs run 
> with 64 MB max heap while others run with 512 MB or more, resulting in 
> memory-related test failures only in some environments. This might complicate 
> debugging.
> 3) Developers will have a better picture of the memory requirements of a test 
> suite if it should fail with OutOfMemoryError via 'ant junitreport'. Without 
> this change, extra effort (e.g. JVM monitoring) is required to know the exact 
> value of the heap size limit that was exceeded.
> A discussion on the derby-dev mailing list provides some more details: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Do-I-need-to-provide-extra-memory-flags-when-using-%22ant-junitreport%22--t4139842.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to