[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag H. Wanvik) writes: > Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On 9/17/07, Dag H. Wanvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> As for having a default role on connect, that could be added later. >>>> This is implementation defined behavior, according to SQL std. >> >> Where does the standard say that? I see in section 4.37.2 the sentence: >> >> "An SQL-session initially has no SQL-session role name." > > Ah, yes I knew I had seen that somewhere. I was referring to Annex B > "Implementation-defined elements", clause 69 b: > > 69) Subclause 17.1, <connect statement>: > : > b) The initial value of the current role name is the null value.
So, for those of us who haven't studied the details of those chapters, does null/no current role name mean "no current role" or "unknown current role"? -- Knut Anders
