[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Martin Zaun updated DERBY-2109:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-2109-06.diff
                DERBY-2109-06.stat

The attached patch DERBY-2109-06 addresses some issues with the unit test for 
System Privileges, described in Rick Hillegas's comments above: The unit test 
should now run from the classes directory as well as the jar files and on all 
Operating Systems (there was a platform dependency, an attempt to provoke a 
non-canonicalizable filename error failed on Unix). In addition, a few unit 
test code cleanups.

Also, the unit test's policy file now contains all necessary grants.

Finally, junit.SecurityManagerSetup needed a small fix to refresh the Policies 
after a new SecurityManager has been installed (otherwise, the old Policies 
stay in effect).

Your comments appreciated,
Martin

> System privileges
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2109
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Security
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Martin Zaun
>         Attachments: DERBY-2109-02.diff, DERBY-2109-02.stat, 
> derby-2109-03-javadoc-see-tags.diff, DERBY-2109-04.diff, DERBY-2109-04.stat, 
> DERBY-2109-05.diff, DERBY-2109-05.stat, DERBY-2109-06.diff, 
> DERBY-2109-06.stat, SystemPrivilegesTestCases.html, systemPrivs.html, 
> systemPrivs.html, systemPrivs.html, systemPrivs.html
>
>
> Add mechanisms for controlling system-level privileges in Derby. See the 
> related email discussion at 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.db.derby.devel/33151.
> The 10.2 GRANT/REVOKE work was a big step forward in making Derby more  
> secure in a client/server configuration. I'd like to plug more client/server 
> security holes in 10.3. In particular, I'd like to focus on  authorization 
> issues which the ANSI spec doesn't address.
> Here are the important issues which came out of the email discussion.
> Missing privileges that are above the level of a single database:
> - Create Database
> - Shutdown all databases
> - Shutdown System
> Missing privileges specific to a particular database:
> - Shutdown that Database
> - Encrypt that database
> - Upgrade database
> - Create (in that Database) Java Plugins (currently  Functions/Procedures, 
> but someday Aggregates and VTIs)
> Note that 10.2 gave us GRANT/REVOKE control over the following  
> database-specific issues, via granting execute privilege to system  
> procedures:
> Jar Handling
> Backup Routines
> Admin Routines
> Import/Export
> Property Handling
> Check Table
> In addition, since 10.0, the privilege of connecting to a database has been 
> controlled by two properties (derby.database.fullAccessUsers and 
> derby.database.defaultConnectionMode) as described in the security section of 
> the Developer's Guide (see 
> http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.2/devguide/cdevcsecure865818.html).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to