[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12534339
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-2348:
-------------------------------------------
>From the history, I can only conclude that the problem described in this bug
>went away once the test was put back to run with the old test harness. (see
>revision http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=521949).
I have access to IBM jvms, and I could undo that change (i.e. run the test
through the NetHarnessJavaTest) and see if the problem still occurs if that
info would help?
Or maybe another look at DERBY-2031 would be a more thorough approach. If I
remember correctly (without properly reading all the notes) Julo wrote a patch
but there was some concern with it.
> testProtocol(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.derbynet.NetHarnessJavaTest)j
> failed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2348
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2348
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Regression Test Failure
> Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4
> Environment: This test failed on ibm142/ibm15.
> Reporter: Suresh Thalamati
> Assignee: Andrew McIntyre
>
> 3)
> testProtocol(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.derbynet.NetHarnessJavaTest)junit.framework.ComparisonFailure:
> Output at line 26 expected:<......> but was:<...9 SECMEC=...>
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.CanonTestCase.compareCanon(CanonTestCase.java:100)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.util.HarnessJavaTest.runTest(HarnessJavaTest.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:76)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:22)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:19)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:23)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
