[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535230
 ] 

Jørgen Løland commented on DERBY-2872:
--------------------------------------

The func spec for replication does not describe the behavior for replication 
failure on the master side. Since replication is intended to *increase* 
availability, I think the best solution is to allow users to continue to access 
the database when replication fails on the master side. I'll add this to the 
func spec in a few days unless I hear objections: 

In the case that the master controller finds that replication has failed, and 
it is not able to correct the problem (e.g. because the slave has crashed), the 
master replication role will be stopped. The database will still be accessable 
for users as if replication was never started.

> Add Replication functionality to Derby
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2872
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2872
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Miscellaneous
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: Jørgen Løland
>            Assignee: Jørgen Løland
>         Attachments: master_classes_1.pdf, poc_master_v2.diff, 
> poc_master_v2.stat, poc_master_v2b.diff, poc_slave_v2.diff, 
> poc_slave_v2.stat, poc_slave_v2b.diff, poc_slave_v2c.diff, 
> proof-of-concept_v2b-howto.txt, proof_of_concept_master.diff, 
> proof_of_concept_master.stat, proof_of_concept_slave.diff, 
> proof_of_concept_slave.stat, replication_funcspec.html, 
> replication_funcspec_v2.html, replication_funcspec_v3.html, 
> replication_funcspec_v4.html, replication_funcspec_v5.html, 
> replication_script.txt, slave_classes_1.pdf
>
>
> It would be nice to have replication functionality to Derby; many potential 
> Derby users seem to want this. The attached functional specification lists 
> some initial thoughts for how this feature may work.
> Dag Wanvik had a look at this functionality some months ago. He wrote a proof 
> of concept patch that enables replication by copying (using file system copy) 
> and redoing the existing Derby transaction log to the slave (unfortunately, I 
> can not find the mail thread now).
> DERBY-2852 contains a patch that enables replication by sending dedicated 
> logical log records to the slave through a network connection and redoing 
> these.
> Replication has been requested and discussed previously in multiple threads, 
> including these:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-user/200504.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]
> http://www.nabble.com/Does-Derby-support-Transaction-Logging---t2626667.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to