Rick Hillegas wrote:
Thanks to everybody for the discussion so far. And thanks to Martin for revising the SystemPrivilegesBehaviour.html summary attached to DERBY-2109. I think that my initial posting garbled the description of the compatibilty issues. I would like to restate what the backward-compatibility issues are:
2) Customers running just with Java Security (but no Authentication): No compatibility issues.
The patch to DERBY-2109 does not implement this, instead 4b) is required:
b) Must add additional privileges to the Java Security policy file (unless the default policy file is used)
Dan.
