[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559994#action_12559994
]
Vemund Østgaard commented on DERBY-3224:
----------------------------------------
Lance Andersen wrote:
> You are not going to want to consider the date portion of the Time object at
> all. Unfortunately how the various Database vendors handle this is something
> i am working to address as it does not line up with the current specs, and i
> partially understand why but am not happy about compatibility, even when
> switching JDBC drivers and utilizing the same database.
>
>
> I will be clarifying this in JDBC 4.1 and then working to get this addressed
> in JSR 169 which is an off-shoot of the JDBC specs.
The only way I see to compare the Time objects without being influenced by the
date portion is to compare what toString() returns.
So, based on the feedback from Lance and Dan I think the best solution is to
add an assertEquals method for Time objects to our test framework that compares
the output from Time.toString().
> Get Suites.All to run on the phoneME advanced platform
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3224
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Test
> Environment: Product: phoneME Advanced (phoneme_advanced_mr2-b34)
> Profile: Foundation Profile Specification 1.1
> JVM: CVM phoneme_advanced_mr2-b34 (interpreter loop)
> Reporter: Vemund Østgaard
> Assignee: Vemund Østgaard
> Attachments: 3224-diff, 3224-diff.stat, 3224-diffv2, 3224-diffv2.stat
>
>
> I'm trying to get suites.All to run on the phoneME advanced platform.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
