[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560151#action_12560151
]
A B commented on DERBY-3257:
----------------------------
I noticed that if the ordering of the predicates inside the HAVING clause is
reversed, the query returns the "other" results, i.e:
-- Returns "2"
SELECT COUNT(t0.ID) FROM TEST_TABLE t0
GROUP BY t0.CODE HAVING (t0.CODE = 'GBR' OR t0.CODE = 'CHA') AND t0.CODE IS
NOT NULL;
-- Returns "4"
SELECT COUNT(t0.ID) FROM TEST_TABLE t0
GROUP BY t0.CODE HAVING (t0.CODE = 'CHA' OR t0.CODE = 'GBR') AND t0.CODE IS
NOT NULL;
With a little tracing it turns out that the HAVING clause is somehow getting
messed up during preprocessing. More specifically, see line 883 in
SelectNode.preprocess():
if (havingClause != null) {
havingClause = havingClause.preprocess(
numTables, fromList, havingSubquerys, wherePredicates);
}
Before the call to "havingClause.preprocess(...)" the HAVING clause is correct:
havingClause ==> (OrNode AND NotNullNode)
where:
-- OrNode ==> (BinaryRelationalOperatorNode_0 OR
BinaryRelationalOperatorNode_1)
-- BinaryRelationalOperatorNode_0 ==> (t0.CODE = 'GBR')
-- BinaryRelationalOperatorNode_1 ==> (t0.CODE = 'CHA')
But after the call to that method, the OrNode has been replaced with its left
operand:
havingClause ==> (BinaryRelationalOperatorNode_0 AND NotNullNode)
So we lose half of the OR condition, and that's why we end up with missing
rows. A good start for this issue would be to set a break point inside the
above "if" statement and then trace through the preprocessing logic to see
when/how/why the OrNode gets replaced with its left operand...
> SELECT with HAVING clause containing OR conditional incorrectly return 1 row
> - should return 2 rows - works correctly with 10.2 DB
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3257
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3257
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1, 10.4.0.0
> Reporter: Stan Bradbury
> Attachments: derby-3257_plan_10.2.txt, derby-3257_plan_10.4.txt,
> TestHaving.java
>
>
> Attached program demonstrates the problem. Only one count is returned
> (matching CODE= GBR) - the count of CODE=CHA is not returned. Works fine
> with versions 10.1 and 10.2 or if program is run using 10.3 jars and 10.2
> database (soft upgrade).
> Query:
> SELECT COUNT(t0.ID) FROM CTS1.TEST_TABLE t0
> GROUP BY t0.CODE
> HAVING (t0.CODE = 'GBR' OR t0.CODE = 'CHA') AND t0.CODE IS NOT NULL
> Incorrect results (see last line):
> Database product: Apache Derby
> Database version: 10.3.1.5 - (579866)
> Driver name: Apache Derby Embedded JDBC Driver
> Driver version: 10.3.1.5 - (579866)
> result: 2
> Correct results:
> Database product: Apache Derby
> Database version: 10.2.2.0 - (485682)
> Driver name: Apache Derby Embedded JDBC Driver
> Driver version: 10.2.2.0 - (485682)
> result: 4
> result: 2
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.