User name corresponding to authentication identifier PUBLIC must be rejected
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-3333
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3333
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Security, SQL
Affects Versions: 10.3.2.1, 10.3.1.4, 10.2.2.0, 10.2.1.6, 10.1.3.1,
10.1.2.1, 10.1.1.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.0, 10.4.0.0
Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
SQL Standard (foundation) says:
Section 5.4 SR 20) No <authorization identifier> shall specify "PUBLIC".
This is a syntax rule which implies a 42xxx SQL state but I wonder if 'invalid
authorization specification.' (28xxx) makes more sense?
Maybe it's 28xxx when used in a connection request and 42xxx in a SQL statement?
Needs to be disallowed on:
JDBC connection requests
GRANT statements, ie. using "PUBLIC" as a delimited identifier.
Existing application impact if the exists a user with an authorization
identifier of PUBLIC in an existing system.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
