[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562880#action_12562880
]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-3351:
----------------------------------------------
> Was the original intention that Store should be usable on its own right?
Yes.
And the upshot of this is that today all the modules in the store are
pluggable. :-) One can implement a different store under Derby today!
The api is not as clean as one written from scratch (the current state has
morphed from a clean api to a not-so clean one over 10+ years of development
and the closer integration of the sql/store layer as it was realized that there
was no demand for a stand alone store).
> Implement a Pluggable Storage Engine Architecture in Derby
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3351
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Services, SQL, Store
> Reporter: Dibyendu Majumdar
> Assignee: Dibyendu Majumdar
>
> My aim is to create a pluggable storage engine architecture for Derby, so
> that the default store implementation can be replaced with alternative
> storage engines. I have created my own storage engine which I would like to
> use with Derby's SQL layer, so that is a motivation. But I also think that
> this will benefit the community, and could lead to a pluggable storage engine
> architecture similar to that of MySQL.
> I am not yet sure where the storage engine boundary should lie. I would
> welcome input in this area.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
