[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12571990#action_12571990
 ] 

Dibyendu Majumdar commented on DERBY-3424:
------------------------------------------

Moving Version out of info would be a solution. Any reason why Version can't 
live in o.a.d.mbeans?

Even if I group info/monitor into one bundle, there will still be cyclical 
dependency between this and mbeans unless we move Version out of info.
At present, I am simply placing each package in its own bundle ... helps when 
there are complex dependencies. Do not know yet what ultimately would be best 
grouping of modules. Initially I wanted to group by layers - services, store, 
language, jdbc, network, with each layer depending on those below. Hopefully I 
can get to this goal once the dependencies are more manageable at the module 
level.


> Add an MBean that an application can register to change the state of Derby's 
> JMX management
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3424
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3424
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: JMX
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Assignee: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Priority: Minor
>
> JMX in Derby was originally proposed as a mechanism to configure Derby 
> replacing or enhancing the system properties which tend to be static in 
> nature. Thus it is somewhat ironic that jmx is enabled with a static system 
> property derby.system.jmx.
> I propose to add a public mbean that allows the state Derby's JMX management 
> to be changed. This bean is not automatically registered by Derby if 
> derby.system.jmx is false, but instead can be registered by an application. I 
> believe this could occur at any time so that JMX could be enabled on a 
> running application, possibly by a remote client.
> This standard Mbean (o.a.d.mbeans.Management & ManagementMBean) would have 
> these operations & attribute:
>     public boolean isManagementActive();
>     public void startManagement(); 
>     public void stopManagement();
> If Derby is not booted within the jvm then the operations would be no-ops.
> If derby.system.jmx is true then Derby will itself register an mbean that 
> implements ManagementMBean to allow dynamic control of the visibility of 
> Derby's mbeans.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to