[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576300#action_12576300
]
djd edited comment on DERBY-3445 at 3/7/08 9:52 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thinking a little more I'm not sure the network server removing its security
manager is a good idea. It would allow any code in shutdown hooks to have free
use of the jvm.
A better long term solution would be to allow a set of policies to be added
into the network server's default set. E.g. could add this policy file
emma.policy:
grant codebase "... path to emma jars" {
// permissions needed
}
java -jar derbyrun.jar server -additionalPolicy emma.policy start
This would then be logically added into the permission set that Derby installs
automatically.
was (Author: djd):
Thinking a little more I'm not sure the network server removing its
security manager is a good idea. It would allow any code in shutdown hooks to
have free use of the jvm.
A better long term solution would be to allow a set of policies to be added
into the network server's default set. E.g. could add this policy file:
grant codebase "... path to emma jars" {
// permissions needed
}
This would then be logically added into the permission set that Derby installs
automatically.
> Make it easier to use the EMMA tool to measure the code coverage of the Derby
> testing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3445
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3445
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build tools
> Reporter: Vemund Østgaard
> Assignee: Vemund Østgaard
> Attachments: 3445-emma-clean-fix-diff, 3445-general-diff,
> 3445-general-diffv2, 3445-singletest-codeline-jars-diff,
> 3445-singletest-diff, 3445-SysinfoLocaleTest-diff, 3445-testspecific-diff,
> 3445-testspecific-diffv2
>
>
> It is a bit tricky to use EMMA to measure code coverage for the derby testing.
> Modifications must be made to the source both to avoid problems with the
> SecurityManager and individual tests. It would be good if these modifcations
> could be done once and for all so that it was easier for anyone to run the
> tests with EMMA.
> It would also be good to have ant tasks that would make it even easier to run
> the tests with EMMA.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
