[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576314#action_12576314
 ] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-3385:
----------------------------------------------

As a style issue I think the sysinfo code would be better as a test generic 
utility in o.a.dt.junit.something since it is independent of MBeans or JMX.

As a community we do seem to have a habit of adding generic utilities into 
specific tests which leads to the same utility in multiple places (but 
sometimes implemented differently :-) Something the old test harness was very 
prone to, it would be good if we can avoid this with Junit tests.



> Tests for JMX Management and Monitoring
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3385
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3385
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: JMX, Test
>            Reporter: John H. Embretsen
>            Assignee: John H. Embretsen
>         Attachments: d3385_ant-junit-all.diff, d3385_jdbcMBeanTest_01.diff, 
> d3385_versionMBeanTest_01.diff, d3385_versionMBeanTest_02.diff, TestJMXp9.java
>
>
> DERBY-1387 implements a new feature set in Derby: Java Management eXtentions 
> (JMX), i.e. standards-based management and monitoring capabilities.
> As these are completely new features providing additional interfaces to a 
> running Derby system, a set of functional regression tests should be added. 
> The new tests should verify that Derby's public JMX API works as intended, 
> and should be able to detect regressions in this area in the future. There is 
> a functional specification (jmxFuncspec.html) attached to DERBY-1387 which 
> may be used as reference.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to