[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12584537#action_12584537
]
Thomas Nielsen commented on DERBY-3571:
---------------------------------------
The diffs you see IMHO look like the optimizer is choosing different solutions
for the subquery flattening?
> LOB locators are not released if the LOB columns are not accessed by the
> client
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3571
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3571
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC, Network Client
> Affects Versions: 10.3.2.1, 10.4.0.0, 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Kristian Waagan
> Fix For: 10.5.0.0
>
> Attachments: derby-3571-1a-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1a-client_track_lob_fix.stat,
> derby-3571-1b-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1c-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1d-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1e-client_track_lob_fix.diff, derby-3571-2a-simple_release.diff,
> derby-3571-2a-simple_release.stat
>
>
> If the client creates a result set containing LOB locator columns and
> iterates through it without actually accessing the LOB columns, the locators
> are not released.
> The amount of locators and their associated LOB objects causes the server to
> consume large amounts of memory and it eventually gets an OOME.
> There are a few workarounds for this bug:
> a) Access and/or properly close the LOBs (i.e. Blob.free).
> This is partly dependent on DERBY-2892.
> b) Invoke Connection.commit (or rollback) periodically, which causes all
> locators on the connection to be released.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
