Bryan Pendleton (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12601316#action_12601316 ]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-3625:
----------------------------------------
Just making sure I understand: the old record ID was 40, and thus fit in a
single byte in the StoredRecordHeader, while the new record ID was 69,
which takes *two* bytes in the StoredRecordHeader?
Yes that is what I think is going on, that is the format used for the
Compressed int.
