[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-3726:
--------------------------------------

       Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])
    Fix Version/s: 10.5.0.0

Thanks for looking at the patch, Kristian. Committed revision 670534.

I wasn't sure whether to keep the workaround for the EPOC bug or not, but I 
found it safest to keep it for now.

I'm planning to port the fix to 10.4 and possibly 10.3 as well.

> Don't call RAFContainer.padFile() from instances of RAFContainer4
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3726
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3726
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.3.0, 10.4.1.3
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d3726-1a.diff
>
>
> In this thread on derby-dev, 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200806.mbox/[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED],
> it was mentioned that RAFContainer4 calls padFile() when creating a 
> container. Since padFile() uses old I/O calls and the rest of RAFContainer4 
> uses NIO, it could possibly cause similar issues as those seen in DERBY-3347. 
> Although we haven't verified that this is a problem, we should try to avoid 
> mixing old I/O and NIO to be on the safe side.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to