[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-3652:
---------------------------------
Attachment: derby-3652-10-aa-SignatureChecker.diff
Attaching derby-3652-10-aa-SignatureChecker.diff. This creates a lint tool,
SignatureChecker and puts it in derbytools.jar. The tool walks all of the
user-coded functions and procedures which have been registered in a database
and verifies whether they can be matched to Java methods. I have successfully
run the tool on Java 5 and on Java ME.
I think that the tool is useful just by itself because it gives customers a
test-time check for signature mismatches. That seems to me to be an improvement
over the run-time checks which customers rely on today.
I also think it would be good to recommend that customers run this tool on
their databases (in soft-upgrade mode) to help verify that their routines have
not been orphaned by enforcement of the ANSI signature checking rules.
Here's the usage diagnostic in English:
"Usage if running on J2SE:
java org.apache.derby.tools.SignatureChecker CONNECTION_URL_TO_DATABASE
Usage if running on J2ME:
java org.apache.derby.tools.SignatureChecker DATABASE_NAME"
You can also run it using the derbyrun shortcut. E.g.:
java -jar trunk/jars/sane/derbyrun.jar SignatureChecker
"jdbc:derby:derby10.5"
Here's what a sample run looks like:
Found a matching method for: "APP"."DOINSERT"( )
Found a matching method for: "APP"."DOINSERTANDCOMMIT"( )
Found a matching method for: "APP"."APPENDFOOANDBAR"( VARCHAR )
Unresolvable routine: "APP"."IDONTEXIST"( VARCHAR , INTEGER ). Detailed
reason: No method was found that matched the method call
z.iDontExist(java.lang.String, int), tried all combinations of object and
primitive types and any possible type conversion for any parameters the method
call may have. The method might exist but it is not public and/or static, or
the parameter types are not method invocation convertible.
Found a matching method for: "APP"."RUNDDL"( VARCHAR )
Unresolvable routine: "APP"."TABFUNCDOESNTEXIST"( VARCHAR , BIGINT ).
Detailed reason: No method was found that matched the method call
org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.lang.TableFunctionTest.appendFooAndBar(java.lang.String,
long), tried all combinations of object and primitive types and any possible
type conversion for any parameters the method call may have. The method might
exist but it is not public and/or static, or the parameter types are not method
invocation convertible.
Touches the following files:
A java/tools/org/apache/derby/tools/SignatureChecker.java
The guts of the tool. Various lookups are indirected through reflection so that
the tool can be agnostic about whether it is running on J2SE or J2ME. In
particular, the function-lookup logic depends on reflection--because the
appropriate DatabaseMetaData methods don't appear in the JDBC interface until
Java 6, even though implementations of the methods appear in our JSR169 client.
M java/tools/org/apache/derby/iapi/tools/run.java
Wires the new tool into the derbyrun logic.
M java/tools/org/apache/derby/loc/toolsmessages.properties
New localizable diagnostics.
M tools/jar/tools.properties
Wires the tool into derbytools.jar.
> Derby does not follow the SQL Standard when trying to map SQL routines to
> Java methods.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3652
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Attachments: badsignatures.sql,
> derby-3652-01-aa-mixTypesOnFirstPass.diff,
> derby-3652-01-ab-mixTypesOnFirstPass.diff,
> derby-3652-01-ac-mixTypesOnFirstPass.diff,
> derby-3652-01-ad-mixTypesOnFirstPass.diff,
> derby-3652-02-aa-dontWidenExceptForSmalllint.diff,
> derby-3652-02-ab-dontWidenExceptForSmalllint.diff,
> derby-3652-03-aa-dontWidenSmallint.diff,
> derby-3652-03-ab-dontWidenSmallint.diff,
> derby-3652-04-aa-deprecateJavaRules.diff, derby-3652-05-aa-moreTests.diff,
> derby-3652-06-aa-dontWidenString.diff,
> derby-3652-07-aa-dontWidenBigDecimal.diff,
> derby-3652-08-aa-dontWidenAtAll.diff, derby-3652-09-aa-mixedTypes.diff,
> derby-3652-10-aa-SignatureChecker.diff, derby-3652-badmatches.diff,
> SignatureMapping.html, SignatureMapping.html, SignatureMapping.html,
> SignatureProblems.java, signatureProblems.sql
>
>
> I have only tested this in the 10.5 trunk. However, I suspect that this
> affects all previous releases of Derby as well.
> In resolving method signatures for function/procedure invocations, the SQL
> standard makes the following definitions in part 13, section 4.5 (parameter
> mapping). These definitions, in turn, refer to tables B-1 and B-3 in JDBC 3.0
> Specification, Final Release, October 2001 ([JDBC]).
> * Simply mappable - This refers to the correspondence of SQL and Java
> types described in [JDBC] table B-1. This is the table which defines the
> mapping of SQL types to Java primitives.
> * Object mappable - This refers to the correspondence of SQL and Java
> types described in [JDBC] table B-3. This is the table which defines the
> mapping of SQL types to Java wrapper objects.
> * Output mappable - For OUT and INOUT parameters, this refers to a single
> element array whose cell is simply mappable or object mappable. E.g.
> Integer[] or float[].
> * Mappable - This means simply, object, or output mappable.
> * Result set mappable - This means a single element array whose cell is a
> type which implements either java.sql.ResultSet or
> sqlj.runtime.ResultSetIterator.
> Putting all of this together, section 4.5 continues:
> "A Java method with M parameters is mappable (to SQL) if and only if, for
> some N, 0 (zero) <= N <= M, the data types of the first N parameters are
> mappable, the last M - N parameters are result set mappable, and the result
> type is either simply mappable, object mappable, or void."
> Section 8.6 gives more detailed rules, but they are hard to follow. According
> to section 8.6, when resolving a routine invocation, Derby should expect to
> find one and only one static mappable method with the expected external name
> (Java class + method name).
> I believe that this is a fair description of the rules. This, at least, is
> what some other databases appear to do. See, for instance,
> http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.help.ase_15.0.java/html/java/java126.htm
> and
> http://www.service-architecture.com/database/articles/mapping_sql_and_java_data_types.html
> We do not have a regression test which verifies that Derby applies the SQL
> standard resolution rules. There may be several divergences from the
> standard. This JIRA is a place to track those discrepancies. Here is one that
> I have noticed:
> The following SQL signature
> ( a int ) returns int
> should be mappable to any of the following Java signatures
> public static int f( int a )
> public static int f( Integer a )
> public static Integer f( int a )
> public static Integer f( Integer a )
> However, I observe that Derby is only able to resolve the first and third
> signatures (the ones with primitive arguments). I will attach a test case
> showing this problem.
> I will also attach an html table summarizing the simply and object mappable
> rules.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
