I would like to get the community's feeling about whether we could or should build a simpler api to the Derby store. I think that this could be useful for applications which just need to put and get data by key value. These would be applications which don't need complex queries or SQL. However, these applications might need transactions, multi-user concurrency, and recoverability. Without the overhead of the SQL interpreter, it seems that such a kernel could potentially:

1) Consume fewer run-time resources, occupy a smaller jarball footprint, and so be a better fit for resource-constrained devices.

2) Be faster.

3) Be simpler to use.

Would the community support such an effort or would this fall outside Derby's charter?

Thanks,
-Rick

Reply via email to