The Directory project is currently using JDBM, but I would love to see Derby offering a BTree implementation that would fit our needs. I see many advantages : - diversity is good. - Derby is Apache - as far as I can see on http://db.apache.org/derby/papers/btree_package.html, Derby BTree offers some functions JDBM does not have
Now, I also love JDBM, because it's fast, it's simple, it's light. I would encourage Derby and JDBM teams to collaborate in order to get this proposal becoming reality. If this is not possible, well, not a big deal. We already have a JDBM backend based implementation, and as we now have a new API to cover our backend, implementing the future Derby-Lite BTree implementation is certainly something we will do. So go ahead, kick the tires ! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/simpler-api-to-the-Derby-store-tp18137499p18372957.html Sent from the Apache Derby Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
