[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12622749#action_12622749
]
Erlend Birkenes commented on DERBY-3829:
----------------------------------------
Hmm, I don't get the permissions errors or any other errors here, seems
something is different on windows. I'll try to figure out what..
I'll change ExecProcUtil.execCmdDumpResults to something else. I could have
just used BaseTestCase.assertExecJavaCmdAsExpected if it could deal with the
parts of the output that are variable..
Is it a good idea to extract the command-running part of
assertExecJavaCmdAsExpected into a new method that just runs the command and
returns the output? assertExecJavaCmdAsExpected would call the new method so it
would stay the same, but the output would be available for manipulation when
that's needed. That would be useful for DERBY-3824 as well. The exact same
thing is done there, so it would at least save some duplicate code. However,
this is the last two places where execCmdDumpResults is used, so maybe it's not
worth messing with it..
> Convert derbynet/sysinfo and derbynet/sysinfo_with_properties to JUnit
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3829
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3829
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: Test
> Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Erlend Birkenes
> Assignee: Erlend Birkenes
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.5.0.0
>
> Attachments: Derby-3829_1.diff
>
>
> I'm guessing these two can be combined into one file
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
