[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-3601:
-----------------------------------

    Attachment: derby-3601-1a-comments_and_renaming.diff

'derby-3601-1a-comments_and_renaming.diff' changes some of the comments in 
LOBStateTracker and renames variables and methods to better reflect reality.
I think when it was first written it was supposed to take care of more than it 
does today. Currently, the class is only used to track whether a LOB has been 
published to the end-user or not (happens through ResultSet.get[BC]lob).
There shouldn't be any functional changes in patch 1a.

The next step is to implement the improvements suggested under this issue.
Patch ready for review.

> Optimize LOBStateTracker for non-locator servers
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3601
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Client, Newcomer
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.1.3, 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Kristian Waagan
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: derby-3601-1a-comments_and_renaming.diff
>
>
> The following comments posted for DERBY-3571 should be addressed if we choose 
> to allow multiple calls to the various getter methods on LOB columns, except 
> for the getter methods returning streams:
> ----- Knut Anders wrote:
> 've tried out the 2a patch and it seems to work as intended. My only nits are:
>   - LOBStateTracker.checkCurrentRow(): couldn't Arrays.fill() be moved inside 
> the if block?
>   - should discardState() and markAccessed() check the release flag?
>   - should ResultSet.createLOBColumnTracker() use 
> LOBStateTracker.NO_OP_TRACKER instead of allocating a new when 
> serverSupportsLocators() returns false?
> -----
> Note that it is a requirement that we allow multiple calls to the getter 
> methods, otherwise we need to maintain the state for non-locator LOB columns 
> as well to track the number of accesses. Another options is to rely on a 
> different mechanism to track accesses.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to