[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kristian Waagan closed DERBY-3825.
----------------------------------


Closing the issue.

Note that getReader is still rather low-performant, compared to what it could 
have been. Again the cause is positioning. The trick I used for 
getInternalReader cannot be used, because the reader from getReader is passed 
out to the user and cannot be shared.
Given the current requirements and limitations, a possible optimization is to 
remember one or more byte/char position and then be able to skip bytes instead 
of chars. The latter requires decoding, the former doesn't.

On the other side, if a user just obtains one reader and keeps reading from it, 
the initial positioning cost doesn't matter that much.
The problem with getSubString has been resolved by the patches committed.

> StoreStreamClob.getReader(charPos) performs poorly
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3825
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3825
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC, Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Kristian Waagan
>             Fix For: 10.4.2.1, 10.5.0.0
>
>         Attachments: derby-3825-0a-preview.diff, 
> derby-3825-1a-reset_readpositioninbuffer.diff, 
> derby-3825-2a-internalReader_repositioning.diff, 
> derby-3825-2a-internalReader_repositioning.stat, 
> derby-3825-2b-internalReader_repositioning.diff, 
> derby-3825-3a-simplification.diff
>
>
> StoreStreamClob.getReader(charPos) performs poorly because it resets the 
> underlying stream and skips data until it reached the requested character 
> position. Not only does the data has to be skipped, it also has to be decoded 
> (UTF-8).
> The problem is exposed through EmbedClob.getSubString, which causes extremely 
> bad performance for the client driver because the locator based Clob 
> implementation uses this method.
> For the record, there is another read buffer size issue that exaggerates the 
> problem (it will probably be handled under DERBY-3769, and also DERBY-3818).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to