[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12659141#action_12659141
]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1465:
-------------------------------------------
Yes, it would be better if consolePropertyMessage passed on the underlying
Exception.
I'll create one last patch modifying just the start and blockingStart methods
and changing the test - then (after one more test cycle) commit that.
I can then look into the consolePropertyMessage change - and will decide then
whether to do it as part of this issue in a follow up commit or log a new issue.
> NetworkServerControl.start() should throw an exception and not just print
> exceptions if the server fails to start
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.1.2.1
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: DERBY-1465.diff3, DERBY-1465.diff4, DERBY-1465.diff5,
> DERBY-1465.diff6, DERBY-1465.diff7, DERBY-1465_diff.txt, DERBY-1465_diff.txt,
> DERBY-1465_stat.txt, DERBY-1465_stat.txt, releaseNote.html, releaseNote.html,
> releaseNote.html
>
>
> NetworkServerControl.start() will not throw an exception if another server
> is already running on the same port. I am not sure but think perhaps this
> was changed at one point to accomodate the derby.drda.startNetworkServer
> property so that the embedded server could continue to boot even if the
> network server failed to start, but I think this is wrong for normal usage.
> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-Network-Server-API-Behavior-p5055814.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
