[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662182#action_12662182
 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-3980:
---------------------------------------

Thanks Knut for figuring out how to set the sleep and deadlock timeout. I made 
the changes you suggested.  Although we are now going through deadlock 
detection, I am still not entirely sure I am  testing the scenario Mike was 
worried about.  If you or Mike have any suggestions on more test scenarios, 
please let me know and I will add them.   I think I will abandon staring at the 
deadlock detection code for a while.    I hope someone that understands this 
code better than I will fix this bug.


> Conflicting select then update with REPEATABLE_READ gives lock timeout 
> instead of deadlock
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3980
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3980
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.3.0, 10.4.2.0, 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>         Attachments: derby-3980_javadoc_and_test_diff.txt, derby.log, 
> derby.log.10_1, javacore.20081209.092827.9800.txt, LiveLockTest_diff.txt, 
> LiveLockTest_with_Deadlock_look_diff.txt, LockTimeoutWithInserts.java, 
> TryTimeout.java, TryTimeout2.java, TryTimeout2.out.10_1.deadlock, 
> TryTimeout2.out.10_1.deadlock, TryTimeout2.out.10_1.locktimeout, 
> TryTimeout2.out.10_1.locktimeout
>
>
> The attached program TryTimeout.java should detect a deadlock but instead 
> throws a lock timeout exception.  The program has two threads that attempt:
>           
>           threadConnection.setAutoCommit(false);
>           /* set isolation level to repeatable read */
>           
> threadConnection.setTransactionIsolation(Connection.TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ);
>           
>           ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from t where i = 456");
>           while (rs.next());
>           stmt.executeUpdate("update t set i = 456 where i = 456");
>           threadConnection.commit();
> This gives SQLState 40001 (deadlock) with DB2 but a lock timeout with Derby.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to