Kristian Waagan <[email protected]> writes: > Dag H. Wanvik wrote: >> Thanks for the good work! >> >> Kristian Waagan <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> testFetchLargeClobPieceByPiece 673707 624639 3370 >>> testFetchLargeClobPieceByPieceBackwards 1138559 1059045 2863 >> >> Interesting; fetching backwards is faster than forwards? :) Test >> artifact, or? > > Hi Dag, > > I certainly hope I haven't optimized for fetching LOBs backwards!
It looks like there are some differences between those tests. They fetch chunks of different sizes, and one of them performs sanity checking against a LoopingAlphabetReader whereas the other one doesn't. So I don't think we can say that fetching backwards is faster just by looking at those numbers. -- Knut Anders
