Kathey
One thing I thought might be worth mentioning, (or it may just muddy
things more) is that for years I have had success giving users builds
that are clearly marked with the the build number (e.g. presenting the
build as 10.3.3.1.706492 instead of just 10.3.3.1). The only real
problem this ever caused was the case where generated code changed and
we needed the version bump for SPS recompile.
I am still not personally adverse to bumping the fourth digit more
often, but thought I would present this as a workable alternative.
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Andrew McIntyre
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Rick Hillegas
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Rick Hillegas
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Kathey Marsden
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Rick Hillegas
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Dag H. Wanvik
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Mike Matrigali
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Myrna van Lunteren
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Rick Hillegas
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Knut Anders Hatlen
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Kathey Marsden
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Kristian Waagan
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Myrna van Lunteren
- Re: Bumping the fourth digit Rick Hillegas
