One thing I thought might be worth mentioning, (or it may just muddy things more) is that for years I have had success giving users builds that are clearly marked with the the build number (e.g. presenting the build as 10.3.3.1.706492 instead of just 10.3.3.1). The only real problem this ever caused was the case where generated code changed and we needed the version bump for SPS recompile. I am still not personally adverse to bumping the fourth digit more often, but thought I would present this as a workable alternative.

Kathey

Reply via email to