Kristian Waagan wrote:
If you plan to vote against the release if DERBY-4075 is outstanding,
I think we need to lay a plan for it.
One thing to note is that the community can still make a release even if
I vote -1. It is not a veto and some might say I am too conservative
about these things, but thanks for placing such importance on my vote
and this issue!
I've been running the test for weeks without seeing the issue. The
largest database grew to 67 GB (plus 67 GB for the backup), another
one grew to 32 GB.
If we clearly communicate the environment where the problems have been
seen, people would get the chance to start test runs of their own.
After all, starting the test itself is very simple.
I tried it on my Windows XP box with IBM 1.6 and cutting the sleeps to
one tenth of their original setting, but ran into out of space errors
after 9 hours. I plan to start playing with this again after my buddy
testing is complete. It would be great if others could kick off runs.
>I have also seen an issue with multi-threaded inserts (25 threads
against the same table) and >a subsequent table compress
Thanks for identifying a new issue. I look forward to hearing more about
it, particularly if it is a regression.
Kathey
