[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-4107:
---------------------------------

           Component/s:     (was: SQL)
                        Documentation
    Bug behavior facts:   (was: [Wrong query result])

I am changing this from a SQL bug to a docs bug. The documentation says that 
the DATE() function, applied to positive integer arguments, results in days 
counting up from the first day of the common era. This is not true. The days 
count up from the beginning of the UNIX epoch, that is, January 1, 1970. I 
think there is a typo in the documentation.

Note that the highest integer argument which you can pass to the DATE function 
is 2932897. That many days after the start of the UNIX epoch is 9999-12-31, I 
think. At least my back of the envelope calculation, which doesn't account for 
leap days, comes in around there. If DATE were counting from the beginning of 
the common era, then DATE( 2932897 ) would be something like 8029-12-31.

I am also unchecking the "wrong query result" box. I can't find this function 
in the SQL standard and I don't see any industry consensus about how DATE 
should behave when applied to integer arguments. I don't see any compelling 
reason to change Derby's behavior to something different, particularly since 
that kind of change would create compatibility problems.

> DATE function returns wrong result for integer argument
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4107
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.2.0
>         Environment: MS Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Pack 2, 
> running NetBeans IDE 6.5
>            Reporter: Nelson Rodrigues
>            Assignee: Yun Lee
>
> When Derby Reference Manual, version 10.4, lists Derby limitations for DATE 
> is said that the smallest DATE value is 0001-01-01 and the largest DATE value 
> is 9999-12-31.
> When the same manual explains the DATE function is said that:
> "The argument must be ... a positive number less than or equal to 2,932,897 
> ... The result is the date that is n-1 days after January 1, 0001, where n is 
> the integral part of the number."
> Testing for the largest integer returns the expected result:
> select date(2932897) from SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1   returns 9999-12-31 -> OK
> The problem comes when testing the smallest integer. We get a result 
> different than we expect:
> select date(1) from SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1   returns 1970-01-01, but it should have 
> returned 0001-01-01
> The smallest date we get using integer as an argument to date function should 
> be the same we get when using the smallest string representation as an 
> argument. In other words date(1) should be equal to date('0001-01-01'). 
> select date('0001-01-01') from SYSIBM.SYSDUMMY1  returns 0001-01-01 -> OK

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to