[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12768855#action_12768855
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1465:
---------------------------------------
I have been thinking about this issue which I filed back in Jan, 2006. At the
time it seemed to make sense, but now the compatibility risks seem significant,
now that Derby has been out for years. I think by now folks have figured out
that they need to ping the server to determine if it is up. If it now starts
throwing an exception it might cause problems.
I think Myrna's work on this issue has been valuable as it helped expose the
issues mentioned in the previous comment, but I am beginning to think we should
close this won't fix. There had been talk about a new API for network server
to replace the one that we have, if we do that then the exception on start
issue can be taken under consideration.
> NetworkServerControl.start() should throw an exception and not just print
> exceptions if the server fails to start
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1465
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1465
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.1.2.1
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Assignee: Myrna van Lunteren
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: DERBY-1465.diff3, DERBY-1465.diff4, DERBY-1465.diff5,
> DERBY-1465.diff6, DERBY-1465.diff7, DERBY-1465.diff8, DERBY-1465_diff.txt,
> DERBY-1465_diff.txt, DERBY-1465_stat.txt, DERBY-1465_stat.txt,
> DERBY-1465hangibm142_12_29_08.txt, DERBY-1465hangibm15_12_29_08.txt,
> releaseNote.html, releaseNote.html, releaseNote.html
>
>
> NetworkServerControl.start() will not throw an exception if another server
> is already running on the same port. I am not sure but think perhaps this
> was changed at one point to accomodate the derby.drda.startNetworkServer
> property so that the embedded server could continue to boot even if the
> network server failed to start, but I think this is wrong for normal usage.
> http://www.nabble.com/Questions-about-Network-Server-API-Behavior-p5055814.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
