As part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3062 I'm trying
to clarify the doc regarding the behavior of the
{ NO SQL | MODIFIES SQL DATA | CONTAINS SQL | READS SQL DATA }
clause. I've cleaned the text up somewhat, and will post a patch shortly,
but some of the text seems to imply that there exist certain SQL
statements which simply can't be executed from a procedure, no matter
what level of SQL support is asserted by the above clause:
MODIFIES SQL DATA
Indicates that the stored procedure can execute any SQL statement
except statements that are not supported in stored procedures.
I tried looking around in code and tests (particularly LangProceduresTest)
but wasn't able to figure out a conclusive answer:
Are there any SQL statements that are illegal in a procedure which
specifies MODIFIES SQL DATA?
thanks,
bryan