[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-651:
--------------------------------
Attachment: derby-651-07-aa-dependencyView.diff
Attaching derby-651-07-aa-dependencyView.diff. This adds dependencies of views
on UDTs. Regression tests pass for me. Committed at subversion revision 889876.
Touches the following files:
M java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/QueryTreeNode.java
Adds a method for adding dependencies on UDTs.
M java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/ValueNode.java
M java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/StaticMethodCallNode.java
Wires that method into nodes which views rely on.
M java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/Price.java
M
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/lang/UDTTest.java
Basic tests for dependencies of views on UDTs.
> Re-enable the storing of java objects in the database
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-651
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Reporter: Rick Hillegas
> Assignee: Rick Hillegas
> Attachments: derby-651-01-aa-basicCreateDropType.diff,
> derby-651-02-af-udtColumnsRetvalsParams.diff,
> derby-651-03-aa-udttestInstability.diff, derby-651-04-aa-javadoc.diff,
> derby-651-05-ac-dependencyTable.diff, derby-651-06-aa-dropTable.diff,
> derby-651-07-aa-dependencyView.diff, UserDefinedTypes.html,
> UserDefinedTypes.html, UserDefinedTypes.html, UserDefinedTypes.html
>
>
> Islay Symonette, in an email thread called "Storing Java Objects in a table"
> on October 26, 2005 requests the ability to store java objects in the
> database.
> Old releases of Cloudscape allow users to declare a column's type to be a
> Serializable class. This feature was removed from Derby because the syntax
> was non-standard. However, most of the machinery to support objects
> serialized to columns is still in Derby and is even used in system tables. We
> need to agree on some standard syntax here and re-expose this useful feature.
> Some subset of the ANSI adt syntax, cumbersome as it is, would do.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
