Kristian Waagan wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
I see the following failures with 10.6.0.0 alpha - (891102)**
**with IBM 1.5 and 1.6.

Any ideas?

Hi Kathey,

Are these errors reproducible, also if you rebuild Derby?
Did you see these when running suites.All?

I will try to narrow this down today. I actually see now that it happened two nights in a row and first occurred between 890158 and 890604 and is only on Windows. I was mistaken about the jvms. It just seems to be IBM 1.5, but running just memory.MultiByteClobTest with the latest on trunk with IBM 1.5 seems to pass for me. I will try Suites.All on my machine and look at the test machine too to see if there might be something going on there.

Oddly the changes in this range don't look very suspect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890220 | kristwaa | 2009-12-14 00:29:59 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 8 lines

DERBY-4473: [patch] remove some allocated but unused objects
Removed the allocation of a StringWriter and a StringBuffer object.

Patch contributed by Dave Brosius (dbrosius at mebigfatguy dot com).

Patch file: ds.diff


------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890345 | kahatlen | 2009-12-14 06:39:49 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 2 lines

DERBY-4476: Use helper methods from IdUtil instead of TupleDescriptor.quoteProtectName()

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890357 | kahatlen | 2009-12-14 07:04:18 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 2 lines

DERBY-4044: Use helper methods from IdUtil to quote SQL identifiers in EmbedResultSet

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890364 | kahatlen | 2009-12-14 07:09:06 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 5 lines

DERBY-4380: Subqueries not allowed in ON clause

Removed translations of error message that was removed by the main
patch for this issue.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890370 | kahatlen | 2009-12-14 07:35:06 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 4 lines

DERBY-2282: Incorrect "transitive closure" logic leads to inconsistent behavior for binary comparison predicates

Extended the fix to work on parameters in addition to constants.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r890448 | kahatlen | 2009-12-14 11:14:04 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009) | 2 lines

DERBY-4297: Removed method that was no longer used after the main fix

------------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to