On 08.02.10 17:05, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
but I didn't do this because I feared too many builds would fail in
that case (i.e. I commit a patch introducing a JavaDoc warning, all
builds with subsequent patches would then fail until my JavaDoc
warning got fixed).
That seems OK to me, actually. Generally, the community seems to fix
problems like these quite rapidly, once we are aware of them.
Just to be clear, you wouldn't mind that a single existing JavaDoc
warning fails the build?
FYI, the job is now on an hourly schedule, the most frequent schedule
recommended by the infra team when polling the SVN repos. It will only
be run if changes in the SVN repos are detected.
--
Kristian
thanks,
bryan
