[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835842#action_12835842
 ] 

Sylvain Leroux commented on DERBY-4550:
---------------------------------------

Thanks for your comments Rick,

My first idea was to model qualifiedIdentifiers as a "pair of string". But, at 
some point, I was wondering if there could be some obscure corner case where 
the same session name will resolve to a different session object. That's why I 
chose to model qualified identifiers as {Session,String}.

But, since there's no variable in ij, dynamic scoping shouldn't be an issue. I 
will rework that way.

----

Concerning the second kind of names recognized by ij you identified:
> 2) Schema object names in the DESCRIBE commands.
> These are already handled by their own production, caIdentifier().
Even if it could be useful to examine the tables in a different connection, I 
already set aside the DESCRIBE command, since offering such a possibility will 
lead to difficult situations:
CONNECT '....' AS C;
DESCRIBE C.T;
Would the above statement describe the "table T of the default schema of the 
connection C" - or "table T of the schema C of the current connection". For 
compatibility the latter would have my preference. But it's a little bit 
confusing anyway - especially if you bring it closer to a statement allowing 
qualified identifier like that:

CONNECT '....' AS C;
DESCRIBE C.T;        -- Here, C is a schema
PREPARE C.ST AS .... -- Here, C is a session


> Using ij to copy data from one DB to an other
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4550
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Sylvain Leroux
>            Assignee: Sylvain Leroux
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-4550.diff, DERBY-4550.sql, DERBY-4550_2.diff, 
> DERBY-4550_2.sql, DERBY-4550_3.patch, DERBY-4550_3.sql
>
>
> It is possible to have open connections to several databases while running 
> ij, but it is not currently possible to copy data from one DB to an other one.
> Not only such a feature would allow to copy data between Derby databases. 
> But, ij being mostly DB agnostic, if will ease import/export from any JDBC 
> compliant data source.
> See 
> http://old.nabble.com/Using-IJ-to-copy-data-from-one-DB-to-an-other-one-td27598138.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to