Thanks, Kim. This is something which the release notes generator should
handle. I will look into this.
Thanks,
-Rick
Kim Haase wrote:
I think in some cases the bugs list may include some that were
actually fixed in 10.5.3. This seems to be the case, for instance,
with DERBY-1923 and DERBY-3737, both of which specify both 10.5.2 and
10.6 as their fix releases for some reason. Is this something I should
check and fix in my JIRAs, or can the release-notes-generating
algorithm be modified for these cases?
Kim
On 04/19/10 11:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
Please review the 10.6 release notes. You can browse them here:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.html?view=co
Please let me know how I can improve the release notes. In particular:
1) Are there missing features which we should describe in the "New
Features" section?
2) Are there fixed bugs which don't appear in the "Bug Fixes"
section? If so, please first try to understand why those bugs don't
appear in the filter which I used to create this list:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314104
3) Are there bugs which need detailed release notes? If so, please
first try to understand why those bugs don't appear in the filter
which I used to create that list:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314103
4) Are there other problems with the release notes?
I would like to compile a list of defects by 5:00 pm San Francisco
time on Wednesday April 21. On Thursday morning I will regenerate the
release notes for a second review.
Thanks,
-Rick
